Removing Federal Reserve & Replacing Gold Standard is the Remedy?
Removing the central bank of the U.S. ( FED ) may simply be a cover-move to bring complete leverage and revenue to the IMF, WCB, or some other entity NOT managed nor owned by anyone publicly accessible... anywhere / anyone else instead of the Treasury Department or similar on behalf of the surety; the citizenry of Amerika.
Not to support the FED, but isn't one bigger issue the charging of INTEREST? Isn't usury the actuator of poverty in the act of money lending... among other ill acts? If the money management was sound, without usury and without favoritism of a particular class over another, wouldn't the needed change simply be changing the characteristics of the instrument itself and also the way in which the money is managed?
And removing private ownership of this money machination as well, right?
Removing the Federal Reserve and not making State banks issue a common U.S. currency or their own would mean the central authority of issuance would instead go elsewhere, either centralized once again by hired hands in Washington or another entity on a foreign land ( eliminating U.S. sovereignty ).
In other words; the owners of the money, its supply and therefore management should be the very people it serves, NOT some clandestine group of asset owners... who by owning the money and having full control and management, in essence have a pawn ticket on a bunch of people known as the citizenry of the United States of Amerika, and by extension, the world.
Time to find good money managers who will do away with other ills beside usury, such as fractional reserve lending.
By placing the inflated amount of outstanding debt ( which is also the amount of money in circulation since the paper is owned by the Federal Reserve, hence the word 'Note' on the paper ) onto the gold standard without an adequate adjustment would cause such a massive hyper inflation that would make $100 be worth $1.00 ( I hypothesize ).
Thus my suggestion to remove two zeros / decimal points from gold's price "if" the day that move is suggested or executed.
This 'adjustment' would, in effect and to their dislike, bankrupt those holding most of their portfolio in physical gold, especially paper gold; all the people who have placed and hedged their bets on gold... instead of on real stuff, like food, land and the things which serve people.
Today, the owners and managers of the money and its supply are not fair money managers, not transparent nor an open group of publicly appointed and easily fired, money managers. We need these strongholds removed / reversed / remedied.
A reverse remedy ( and something that cannot be suggested by some wealthy folk ) is to recompense the people NOT holding any asset or wealth. If gold continues passed it's recent high of five months ago of $1900+ an ounce, and the collective debt money AT interest is so astronomically large that it cannot be repaid ( because not enough money exists presently nor can exist to pay back both principle and interest ), then valuation of real things ( land, products, labor ) will experience a strong adjustment. Money continues to be issued as a new debt to service the prior issued debt, thus increasing the amount of money / debt in circulation.
You know something fishy has gone on when the rabbit hole keeps getting deeper and you thought you were already at the bottom.
To learn more, visit and support the cause of valuing people over money.
Not to support the FED, but isn't one bigger issue the charging of INTEREST? Isn't usury the actuator of poverty in the act of money lending... among other ill acts? If the money management was sound, without usury and without favoritism of a particular class over another, wouldn't the needed change simply be changing the characteristics of the instrument itself and also the way in which the money is managed?
And removing private ownership of this money machination as well, right?
Removing the Federal Reserve and not making State banks issue a common U.S. currency or their own would mean the central authority of issuance would instead go elsewhere, either centralized once again by hired hands in Washington or another entity on a foreign land ( eliminating U.S. sovereignty ).
In other words; the owners of the money, its supply and therefore management should be the very people it serves, NOT some clandestine group of asset owners... who by owning the money and having full control and management, in essence have a pawn ticket on a bunch of people known as the citizenry of the United States of Amerika, and by extension, the world.
Time to find good money managers who will do away with other ills beside usury, such as fractional reserve lending.
By placing the inflated amount of outstanding debt ( which is also the amount of money in circulation since the paper is owned by the Federal Reserve, hence the word 'Note' on the paper ) onto the gold standard without an adequate adjustment would cause such a massive hyper inflation that would make $100 be worth $1.00 ( I hypothesize ).
Thus my suggestion to remove two zeros / decimal points from gold's price "if" the day that move is suggested or executed.
This 'adjustment' would, in effect and to their dislike, bankrupt those holding most of their portfolio in physical gold, especially paper gold; all the people who have placed and hedged their bets on gold... instead of on real stuff, like food, land and the things which serve people.
Today, the owners and managers of the money and its supply are not fair money managers, not transparent nor an open group of publicly appointed and easily fired, money managers. We need these strongholds removed / reversed / remedied.
A reverse remedy ( and something that cannot be suggested by some wealthy folk ) is to recompense the people NOT holding any asset or wealth. If gold continues passed it's recent high of five months ago of $1900+ an ounce, and the collective debt money AT interest is so astronomically large that it cannot be repaid ( because not enough money exists presently nor can exist to pay back both principle and interest ), then valuation of real things ( land, products, labor ) will experience a strong adjustment. Money continues to be issued as a new debt to service the prior issued debt, thus increasing the amount of money / debt in circulation.
You know something fishy has gone on when the rabbit hole keeps getting deeper and you thought you were already at the bottom.
To learn more, visit and support the cause of valuing people over money.
Comments