Promote the General Welfare
The mentality making decisions based on personal gain above natural considerations ( people and nature ) is the same mentality that gladly justifies a company laying off workers to stay afloat, in order to increase the bottom line, hence increasing the value of the company... yet this 'survival of the fittest' lifestyle in the city is a dismal proposition and should only be experienced, if at all, in the realm of players who know the game ( and people's livelihoods is not a commodity to be traded, bought or sold ).
There is no wild west to fear mysterious rogue outlaws running in and out of town with the townspeople's purse, right? Or can the very top of the ladder be those near the purse-snatchers, while all along the public has been hoodwinked into thinking it is always someone from the poor lower classes doing the looting, the terrorizing and the conspiring?
If the laid off workers are not 'supported' by the very mechanism which is present ( and collecting revenue via almost every facet of life ), the governing entities cannot rightfully demand tax nor tribute for their lack of 'services.' Without adequate options ( another job ) or knowledge to commence a private venture ( self employment / entrepreneurial effort ), the citizen will become anxious and restless among other socially adverse traits. The welfare is just enough circus bread and diversion to supplement a somewhat domesticated tranquility while waiting for the next 'opportunity / wage job' and resume their working five days to spend and consume two days.
Eliminating this very reality is truly eliminating the very mechanism of empire / the Babylonian System.... of buying and selling.
One business dictum is: when times are tough, market to the upper class / rich people since they have 'disposable income.'
When a particularly influential class and culture of people focus inwardly instead of in reality through the influx of the ideas and opinions of others from all walks of life, they can make great and noble strides in the outcome of worldly affairs... or can hurt the world in irreparably devastating ways just the same.
The posing of the argument: "Ending welfare programs will encourage the current recipients to get a job" could very well be another divisive propaganda idiom used to obfuscate the possibly more important debating question: "Why are wealthy people so greedy / insecure with their riches? And why do they react just like a child would in fear of losing their most favorite toy?
This same mentality, without sober judgment, is incapable of separating their ego from their environment. This mentality continues to adversely affect the very river of labor and human resources necessary for the entire system to stand.
Promote your personal welfare here.
There is no wild west to fear mysterious rogue outlaws running in and out of town with the townspeople's purse, right? Or can the very top of the ladder be those near the purse-snatchers, while all along the public has been hoodwinked into thinking it is always someone from the poor lower classes doing the looting, the terrorizing and the conspiring?
If the laid off workers are not 'supported' by the very mechanism which is present ( and collecting revenue via almost every facet of life ), the governing entities cannot rightfully demand tax nor tribute for their lack of 'services.' Without adequate options ( another job ) or knowledge to commence a private venture ( self employment / entrepreneurial effort ), the citizen will become anxious and restless among other socially adverse traits. The welfare is just enough circus bread and diversion to supplement a somewhat domesticated tranquility while waiting for the next 'opportunity / wage job' and resume their working five days to spend and consume two days.
Eliminating this very reality is truly eliminating the very mechanism of empire / the Babylonian System.... of buying and selling.
One business dictum is: when times are tough, market to the upper class / rich people since they have 'disposable income.'
When a particularly influential class and culture of people focus inwardly instead of in reality through the influx of the ideas and opinions of others from all walks of life, they can make great and noble strides in the outcome of worldly affairs... or can hurt the world in irreparably devastating ways just the same.
The posing of the argument: "Ending welfare programs will encourage the current recipients to get a job" could very well be another divisive propaganda idiom used to obfuscate the possibly more important debating question: "Why are wealthy people so greedy / insecure with their riches? And why do they react just like a child would in fear of losing their most favorite toy?
This same mentality, without sober judgment, is incapable of separating their ego from their environment. This mentality continues to adversely affect the very river of labor and human resources necessary for the entire system to stand.
Promote your personal welfare here.
Comments