Communist Manifestation of Human Yearnings
Regarding a summary reading of the Communist Manifesto -
If I could summarize: I see a communist over-lord of a quasi-capitalist support system with tones of socialism interlocking the two... and surely something else which escapes definition at this time. Meaning, many of the demands of that manifesto are already evident. The problem is, how it is seen as 'evil' has been propagandized by the U.S. government for quite some time. And the Soviets also propagandized their populous with the same negative messages about capitalism during the same time, beginning with the defeat of Hitler's Germany. So to see these things in the 'light' of reality is difficult, for the landscape of thought has been tainted for some time now ( 1984 ).
What is inherently evil is power and influence being concentrated into few hands... and we've seen this power being a corruptible force in the church, in government, in business and in the family... in all forms of government or social organization, unfortunately. All these social systems have their limitations yet have their escape clauses, or at least should have: disassociation, revolt, resignation / market competition, divorce, for example.
Yet, the supposed 'benefits' of that manifesto for the proletariat has become more of a nightmare in some cases, especially the allowance of usury demanded for the use centralized money, to name one.
One positive ( which can be debated, but must be acknowledged to as being a positive force which has propelled the populous forward ) is the public school system, even with all the faults found in it today. If it were not for the public school system, where would a working mother and father had found the time to teach anything outside of regular life skills to their children? Where would any basis of education outside of language and basic hygiene skills be taught / inherited aside from their parent's trades would a child be possibly exposed to? ( hygiene is a bit reaching, I know, a poor example, but used as a banality to make a point ).
So, I see a private ownership of money and a private ownership of many government functions ( behind the guise of publicly controlled ) ran by the descendents and associates of the hegemony ( the fix of class distinction clarified by the manifesto ), with sections of socialized society around the country and within its functions, thus far.
I don't think communism, in its theory on paper, truly works on its own. For there will always be someone at the helm having all the leverage their position provides, and the heart of man is too easily corrupted. Much like the quote: “Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely” by John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton.
I am for private ownership of homes and business ( but I am for limit to the size of said businesses and their means of production, which is what anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws were supposed to achieve: the promotion of healthy competition and opportunity for consumer options and choice - a basic of economics providing a vibrant market which lowers prices and improves goods and services ).
I am for the education of everyone, whether privately or publicly, but some kind of 'open book' education of the basics, from food growth to energy independence, for example. Everyone should be taught to excel in whatever they see value in, taught that they have inalienable rights and limitless possibilities and virtues that are unfathomable and immeasurable, if only allowed to flourish and which only are limited by their exploration. Everyone should be taught the difference between an asset and a liability, as well as what money ( a medium of exchange ) really is, and taught true history according to all sources of facts available, not according to the victors of war and from an ethnic-favoring narrative / point of view.
To learn about how money is really made in Amerika and 'what' it really is, go here:
SmartPeopleSmartMoney.com ( and thank you for your support *click*ads* )
If I could summarize: I see a communist over-lord of a quasi-capitalist support system with tones of socialism interlocking the two... and surely something else which escapes definition at this time. Meaning, many of the demands of that manifesto are already evident. The problem is, how it is seen as 'evil' has been propagandized by the U.S. government for quite some time. And the Soviets also propagandized their populous with the same negative messages about capitalism during the same time, beginning with the defeat of Hitler's Germany. So to see these things in the 'light' of reality is difficult, for the landscape of thought has been tainted for some time now ( 1984 ).
What is inherently evil is power and influence being concentrated into few hands... and we've seen this power being a corruptible force in the church, in government, in business and in the family... in all forms of government or social organization, unfortunately. All these social systems have their limitations yet have their escape clauses, or at least should have: disassociation, revolt, resignation / market competition, divorce, for example.
Yet, the supposed 'benefits' of that manifesto for the proletariat has become more of a nightmare in some cases, especially the allowance of usury demanded for the use centralized money, to name one.
One positive ( which can be debated, but must be acknowledged to as being a positive force which has propelled the populous forward ) is the public school system, even with all the faults found in it today. If it were not for the public school system, where would a working mother and father had found the time to teach anything outside of regular life skills to their children? Where would any basis of education outside of language and basic hygiene skills be taught / inherited aside from their parent's trades would a child be possibly exposed to? ( hygiene is a bit reaching, I know, a poor example, but used as a banality to make a point ).
So, I see a private ownership of money and a private ownership of many government functions ( behind the guise of publicly controlled ) ran by the descendents and associates of the hegemony ( the fix of class distinction clarified by the manifesto ), with sections of socialized society around the country and within its functions, thus far.
I don't think communism, in its theory on paper, truly works on its own. For there will always be someone at the helm having all the leverage their position provides, and the heart of man is too easily corrupted. Much like the quote: “Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely” by John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton.
I am for private ownership of homes and business ( but I am for limit to the size of said businesses and their means of production, which is what anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws were supposed to achieve: the promotion of healthy competition and opportunity for consumer options and choice - a basic of economics providing a vibrant market which lowers prices and improves goods and services ).
I am for the education of everyone, whether privately or publicly, but some kind of 'open book' education of the basics, from food growth to energy independence, for example. Everyone should be taught to excel in whatever they see value in, taught that they have inalienable rights and limitless possibilities and virtues that are unfathomable and immeasurable, if only allowed to flourish and which only are limited by their exploration. Everyone should be taught the difference between an asset and a liability, as well as what money ( a medium of exchange ) really is, and taught true history according to all sources of facts available, not according to the victors of war and from an ethnic-favoring narrative / point of view.
To learn about how money is really made in Amerika and 'what' it really is, go here:
SmartPeopleSmartMoney.com ( and thank you for your support *click*ads* )
Comments