Open Letter to Market Makers and Manipulators
Regardless of which direction the market will go tomorrow,
the longs will go long and the shorts will go short,
the shorts will go long,
if their short first, did not work.
The longs too will go short
if the longs just, don't, quite, work.
When do you suppose enough open minded people will find and vote for candidates who don't make bureaucracy their bread and butter ( they run the office for free / donate the salary to _______ charitable whatever, or it's their only source of income for the term of the office )?
And let not these candidates be born with silver spoons; Be it someone who arrives in office not for the dollar, but for results, not to continue a policy / ideal / daddy's glory / inheritance ( aristocracy ), but do what the will of the conscientiousness of the people want.
I don't think it wise to have candidates who are not lawyers yet have lawyers write their mission statements and that fine print. Or have candidates who are lawyers and run the office for profit.
I would like to see all offices in government earn a very good wage ( as they already do ), yet not be given / earn / receive / accept any more than what was to be their only compensation / salary by law, and will be held accountable if accepting compensation from another source while in office to show loyalty and not favoritism. This "bait" money or "carrots" set before these offices is a cause for the lack of people-centric policy and continued self-centric policy ( meaning policy for profit but still someone is impoverished ).
This type of candidate could leave his business on hiatus, or retire part time or quite altogether and pick up later after filling the office, or they could leave their drudgery job, free from the routine, monotonous repetition of the same schedule, the same drive to work, the same lunch break, the same few friendly folk you may say hello to and break bread with... those folks could use a six figure income, get driven around all over the city to conduct real business, and say yes to the man with merit, and no to the fast money making M.O. ( Modus Operandi ):
ACTUALLY DO THE JOB OF JUST GOVERNMENT.
1) FACILITATE THE AGREEMENTS AND DISAGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE STATES AND BETWEEN OTHER COUNTRIES,
2) IMPLEMENT THE WILL AND VOICE OF STATE CONSTITUENTS BY SIMPLE BALLOT,
3) REPRESENT EACH NATURALLY BORN AND FIRST GENERATION PERSON, THIS FREE PERSON BEING A SLAVE TO NO MAN OR INSTITUTION, BUT SLAVE ONLY TO THEIR OWN WORD, ACTION, CHOICES AND CONSEQUENCES.
It may be a step down for most folks in this area of ambitious personality, credential, education, bank account / business savvy, blah, blah blah, etc. to leave their motivation for getting up in the morning. Motivation not only in words, pretty speeches but no quantifiable accounts ( numbers represent actual results ).
I think we need non-profit leadership. Both for Prophets and not-for-profits.
We've been Romanized and we are Romanizing what has yet to be.
the longs will go long and the shorts will go short,
the shorts will go long,
if their short first, did not work.
The longs too will go short
if the longs just, don't, quite, work.
When do you suppose enough open minded people will find and vote for candidates who don't make bureaucracy their bread and butter ( they run the office for free / donate the salary to _______ charitable whatever, or it's their only source of income for the term of the office )?
And let not these candidates be born with silver spoons; Be it someone who arrives in office not for the dollar, but for results, not to continue a policy / ideal / daddy's glory / inheritance ( aristocracy ), but do what the will of the conscientiousness of the people want.
I don't think it wise to have candidates who are not lawyers yet have lawyers write their mission statements and that fine print. Or have candidates who are lawyers and run the office for profit.
I would like to see all offices in government earn a very good wage ( as they already do ), yet not be given / earn / receive / accept any more than what was to be their only compensation / salary by law, and will be held accountable if accepting compensation from another source while in office to show loyalty and not favoritism. This "bait" money or "carrots" set before these offices is a cause for the lack of people-centric policy and continued self-centric policy ( meaning policy for profit but still someone is impoverished ).
This type of candidate could leave his business on hiatus, or retire part time or quite altogether and pick up later after filling the office, or they could leave their drudgery job, free from the routine, monotonous repetition of the same schedule, the same drive to work, the same lunch break, the same few friendly folk you may say hello to and break bread with... those folks could use a six figure income, get driven around all over the city to conduct real business, and say yes to the man with merit, and no to the fast money making M.O. ( Modus Operandi ):
ACTUALLY DO THE JOB OF JUST GOVERNMENT.
1) FACILITATE THE AGREEMENTS AND DISAGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE STATES AND BETWEEN OTHER COUNTRIES,
2) IMPLEMENT THE WILL AND VOICE OF STATE CONSTITUENTS BY SIMPLE BALLOT,
3) REPRESENT EACH NATURALLY BORN AND FIRST GENERATION PERSON, THIS FREE PERSON BEING A SLAVE TO NO MAN OR INSTITUTION, BUT SLAVE ONLY TO THEIR OWN WORD, ACTION, CHOICES AND CONSEQUENCES.
It may be a step down for most folks in this area of ambitious personality, credential, education, bank account / business savvy, blah, blah blah, etc. to leave their motivation for getting up in the morning. Motivation not only in words, pretty speeches but no quantifiable accounts ( numbers represent actual results ).
I think we need non-profit leadership. Both for Prophets and not-for-profits.
We've been Romanized and we are Romanizing what has yet to be.
Comments