Faithlessness In Politics
It is interesting to see religion’s role in politics. Sometimes religion is used as a convenient tool. Other times, religion is the medium of thought and decision.
Recently I saw a politician’s invitation to answer questions
come onto my FaceBook feed. This
particular politician wanted to discuss;: cowardice, Charlie Hebdo and radical
Islamists. What was also mentioned was “the
war on terror.” I found it as a grand
opportunity to make some valuable points.
I asked if Yeshua Christ would drop bombs onto religious
extremists or would He instead love them.
I wrote some other thought-provoking and soul-searching things. The response from the politico and from his
fans was interesting to put it mildly.
He mentioned a Catholic doctrine that justifies war. He also wrote that Hitler was not stopped by
love but by a superior war effort. That
was it; no further discussion.
The fans responded with religious rhetoric. Most shared their brand of religion and
political view. We all have a perception,
as do I, so I tried my best to read where they were writing from. I continued to stress “love your enemy” and “bless
and do not curse” and “turn the other cheek,” asking where these became “bomb
them if diplomacy fails” and “attack them before they attack us” in the context
of the U.S. being a “Christian nation.” The
Inquisition was a departure from “love your enemy,” so the Catholic doctrine
response falls flat for me.
Another thing I found interesting was that the politician’s
sole response garnered ten times the “likes” my initial point made. I know popular sentiment doesn’t equal truth
or what is right, but it is always interesting to see popularity trump common
sense.
No one has been able to show Christ changing His mind, but
justification and human logic continues.
Comments